I was up late last night playing chess online. Man, chess is a difficult game. It requires a humble attitude in order to accept losses and invest in the play and study time necessary to gradually improve. Which I’ve not done because I keep tinkering with my chess engine (a programming pursuit) instead of working on my game. Anyhow, after getting my ass handed to me online, I thought I’d spend time today to write a blog post about recent news that shocked the chess world.
Last month, Magnus Carlsen was in Madrid, Spain where the Candidates Tournament was held. As the current chess World Champion, he wasn’t playing in the tournament, he was just- I don’t know- hanging out. The winner of the Candidates will challenge Carlsen next year for the title of World Champion. Well, chess fans hoped so. As we learned shortly after the Candidates, Carlsen decided, for reasons I don’t fully understand, not to defend his title. But that’s not the news I’d like to write about.
This post is about girl power.
Let me explain. I read an interview of Swedish WFM Anna Cramling in which she stated, in response to a question about supporting women in chess:
I think that for getting more girls to start playing chess, role models are very important in general. We’ve now seen female streamers and I think that’s a great thing, but it’s also very important to have women who play chess in tournaments. People like GM Judit Polgár, for instance; people like that who are ambassadors for chess are very important. Judit Polgár has done a lot for chess after she retired from the competitive side of the game as well.
I think that when girls see other girls playing chess, or women playing chess, this stereotype that “girls don’t play chess” kind of disappears. Girls will think, “Oh, that looks cool. I want to do this too. How do you do this? Show me!”
Right on! There is no better role model for women in chess than Judit Polgár.
Magnus Carlsen is, arguably, the strongest chess player the world has ever seen. A case can be made that perhaps Garry Kasparov or Bobby Fischer, in their prime, were stronger players than Carlsen.
There is no debate, however, about who is the strongest female chess player. It’s Judit Polgár, no contest. No other woman has come close to her accomplishments. She is retired now. However, in the early 2000s, she was among the strongest players in the world competing in the highest-level tournaments. She reached a peak rank of 8th best in the world.
Let me put in perspective for you the stratospheric level of chess Polgár and Carlsen play. I’m struggling to win games way down in the patzer territory of an 800 Elo rating. Judit Polgár and Magnus Carlsen have peak ratings of 2735 and 2882 respectively. Roughly speaking, a 100 point gap in Elo rating indicates the weaker player has a 36% chance of winning a game. 200 point gap = 24%, 400 point gap = 9%, 800 point gap = 1%, gap between Carlsen and me = I have no chance to win.
In the 2000s, Judit Polgár was competing against men in a game of intelligence. Defeating them. Dealing with their chauvinistic attitudes. One example:
At Linares 1994, Polgár lost a controversial game to the World Champion Garry Kasparov. The tournament marked the first time the 17-year-old Polgár was invited to compete with the world’s strongest players. After four games she had two points. During her game with Kasparov in the fifth round, Kasparov gradually outplayed her and had a clear advantage after 35 moves. On his 36th move, the World Champion reportedly changed his mind about the move of a knight, and moved the piece to a different square. According to chess rules, once a player has released a piece, the move must stand, so if Kasparov did remove his hand, he should have been required to play his original move. Polgár did not challenge Kasparov in the moment, because, she stated, “I was playing the World Champion and didn’t want to cause unpleasantness during my first invitation to such an important event. I was also afraid that if my complaint was overruled I would be penalized on the clock when we were in time pressure.” She did, however, look questioningly at the arbiter, Carlos Falcon, who witnessed the incident and took no action.
The incident was caught on tape by a crew from the Spanish television company PVS, and the videotape showed that Kasparov’s fingers had left the knight. Tournament director Carlos Falcon did not forfeit Kasparov when this evidence was made available to him. As U.S. chess journalist Shelby Lyman pointed out, in the majority of sports “instant replays” do not overrule a referee’s original decision and chess is no exception. At the time the video had not been publicly released, at the request of tournament sponsor Luis Rentero, but it is now available on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw4g3iDrsNk. At one point Polgár reportedly confronted Kasparov in the hotel bar, asking him, “How could you do this to me?” Following this incident, Kasparov bluntly told an interviewer “… she just publicly said I was cheating. … I think a girl of her age should be taught some good manners before making such statements.”
Yeah, not cool. Now you understand my use of the word girl.
Just to be clear. The above incident involved a former World Champion, Garry Kasparov, not Magnus Carlsen. I’m relating it to illustrate the shit she’s had to deal with when men don’t want to face the fact she is capable of defeating them.
That’s the backstory. Now, what happened in Madrid last month?
Magnus is hanging out in a park near the Candidates tournament. He’s playing games against chess hustlers, local Spanish players, and chess fans who realized the World Champion was nearby and willing to give anyone a game. He’s cool like that. Who walks up to the table and asks Magnus for a game? You guessed it, Judit Polgár.
What will happen when the strongest-ever female chess player challenges the strongest-ever male chess player to a game of blitz chess? Each player has three minutes to make all their moves. How long will the girl last? Before you watch their game, consider the challenges Judit faced.
- Judit is 46 years old.
- Magnus is 31 years old.
- At the uppermost levels, chess is a young person’s game.
- Judit has been retired from competitive play for eight years.
- Magnus is an active player.
- Magnus is the highest rated player in the world.
- Magnus is the current World Champion.
- As recently as two years ago, Magnus had an unbeaten streak of 125 games at classical time control, over a period of two years and three months.
What will happen? See for yourself.
Booyah! She’s incredible. I like when Magnus realizes he’s in serious trouble, is determined to find a way to defend, and says to the onlookers, “No applause yet. I’m going to find it.” Or maybe he says, “I’m going to fight.” When he realizes it’s hopeless, he offers his hand in resignation to Judit.
Now you know something about Judit Polgár. Share it with others, because her story is inspiring. You can gain the listener’s attention by beginning with a quote from a Grandmaster, who recalled Judit Polgár beating him when he was an established player and she was just a child. Who is Judit Polgár? He described her as:
This cute little auburn-haired monster who crushed you.
I had my chess engine, MadChess (approximately 2700 Elo), and a world-class chess engine, Komodo Dragon (3450 Elo), analyze Judit Polgár and Magnus Carlsen’s blitz game.
I am a male and big fan of Judit Polgár but your article needs a few corrections.
Judit did not have to put off with “a lot of shit” because men did not want to “want to face the fact she is capable of defeating them”. This was one incident with Kasparov, a man who can get a bit arrogant on his bad days. Generally Judit is very liked and respected along the chess community.
And about Magnus being crushed by Judit… I hope you understand how ridiculously that sounds. This is a chill
game played for fun in a park, not a official game. In fact Judit never won against Magnus in an official game,
only in an exhibition match they had which she ultimately lost 3-1.
Magnus is the best played ever, his skills are far superior to Polgár’s, fact she has admitted multiple times.
She is on the other hand a huge chess ambassador, an extremely skilled and strong GM and also a very entertaining commentator.
I am pretty sure she would not like to be spoken about using the kind of demeanor and writing you use in your article.
I think it’s highly unlikely Judit Polgár didn’t experience sexism in the chess world until she played Garry Kasparov. I mean, we just witnessed Ilya Smirin say a female Grandmaster was “playing like a man” due to her positional style and strong endgame. See https://twitter.com/jenshahade/status/1574805587027714050.
“This is a chill game played for fun in a park, not a official game.” Yeah, I know. I’ve written a chess engine. I understand the importance of game conditions, statistical significance, and the insignificance of a small sample size- certainly the insignificance of one game. This blog post relates a fun anecdote. It’s not meant as scientific proof of anything. My engine defeats Sjeng 3.0 (2835 Elo) regularly in gauntlet tournaments I run. I’m not under the mistaken impression my engine is stronger than Sjeng 3.0.
I think it’s highly unlikely any woman hasn’t experienced a good deal of sexism in their life. I’d imagine that’s even more likely in a field so male dominated as chess.
Overall i agree, they are very strong players. However your math is wrong,…because after ( i think) 2200, the rating point differences have larger magnitudes with respect to probability of win vs loss, there is another bump around 2400. So it much much worse than you think, i hope play between 1950 and 2150, and could not beat either of them on Ritalin even if i scratched theirs eyes and knocked all the pieces over on the board 🙂
Ha ha. Yeah, they don’t need to see the pieces on the board to defeat us mere mortals. They could defeat us while blindfolded.
The relationship between rating point difference and probability of win / loss (more accurately, expected points scored) is independent of rating. I believe you’re thinking of the K-factor, which is larger for new and weaker players (allowing greater point changes per game to get them to their “true” rating quicker) and smaller for established and stronger players (to stabilize their ratings). See the explanation of K-factor in the help notes of the FIDE Rating Change Calculator.