I posted the following message on TalkChess, a forum focused on chess engine programming. The topic is tangentially related to chess engine programming.
Drama in the World of Chess
Nineteen year-old Hans Niemann, unknown in the world of elite chess until very recently, sporting an improbably flat then steep rating progression, defeated World Champion Magnus Carlsen in a tournament game. Did Hans cheat? Did he receive computer assistance? Or did Magnus play poorly?
My Thoughts (Posted on TalkChess)
Hans Niemann strikes me as an Andy Kaufman-like character. You know, someone who gets off on people hating him, loves playing the villain, loves orchestrating a long con, seems anxious for a big reveal where he can expose his detractors as idiots, then bask in his sanctimony.
That’s my impression of him. He seems to be playing a character: the wild-eyed, misunderstood genius who cannot suffer fools and is impatient with the unimaginative, bourgeois chess establishment.
Whether this is based on…
Derogatory comments Hans endured while stuck in the 2400s (not smart enough, not talented enough, etc) that inspired him to seek revenge by doubling-down his efforts, leading to a legitimate rise to the elite level, or…
Hans realizing there’s no audience for the bad-boy, trash-talking villain in the 2400s; that no one cares unless the villain rises to the top and knocks the kings and princes off their thrones; so Hans decided to leverage computer assistance to get himself on the stage.
… is unclear to me at this time.
I’m skeptical based on Niemann’s history of cheating online. Plus GMs have said his post-game analysis is incoherent. Plus GM Larry Kaufman’s story (earlier in this thread) indicating Kaufman likely personally experienced playing against a cheater who couldn’t competently discuss the game he just played. I interpreted it as an experienced chess pro saying yes, it happens.
I have released version 3.1 of my chess engine. I worked on the engine over the last year occasionally, when I had time in the evenings. Slowly, I’ve added about 100 Elo points of playing strength compared to the prior release.
You may download x64 and x86 versions of the engine from the Downloads page. Install the appropriate version for your computer’s CPU. The x64 binary is the strongest version of the engine.
I estimate MadChess 3.1 plays bullet chess at 2706 Elo and blitz chess at 2742 Elo.
Of course, you may decrease MadChess’ strength for a more enjoyable game via the UCI_LimitStrength and UCI_Eloengine options. Enjoy!
Now I’ll take a break from engine programming and actually play some chess. I’ll focus on improving my game (beyond patzer level) before the urge to improve MadChess’ game (to 2800 Elo) inevitably strikes.
I was up late last night playing chess online. Man, chess is a difficult game. It requires a humble attitude in order to accept losses and invest in the play and study time necessary to gradually improve. Which I’ve not done because I keep tinkering with my chess engine (a programming pursuit) instead of working on my game. Anyhow, after getting my ass handed to me online, I thought I’d spend time today to write a blog post about recent news that shocked the chess world.
Last month, Magnus Carlsen was in Madrid, Spain where the Candidates Tournament was held. As the current chess World Champion, he wasn’t playing in the tournament, he was just- I don’t know- hanging out. The winner of the Candidates will challenge Carlsen next year for the title of World Champion. Well, chess fans hoped so. As we learned shortly after the Candidates, Carlsen decided, for reasons I don’t fully understand, not to defend his title. But that’s not the news I’d like to write about.
This post is about girl power.
Let me explain. I read an interview of Swedish WFM Anna Cramling in which she stated, in response to a question about supporting women in chess:
I think that for getting more girls to start playing chess, role models are very important in general. We’ve now seen female streamers and I think that’s a great thing, but it’s also very important to have women who play chess in tournaments. People like GM Judit Polgár, for instance; people like that who are ambassadors for chess are very important. Judit Polgár has done a lot for chess after she retired from the competitive side of the game as well.
I think that when girls see other girls playing chess, or women playing chess, this stereotype that “girls don’t play chess” kind of disappears. Girls will think, “Oh, that looks cool. I want to do this too. How do you do this? Show me!”
Right on! There is no better role model for women in chess than Judit Polgár.
Magnus Carlsen is, arguably, the strongest chess player the world has ever seen. A case can be made that perhaps Garry Kasparov or Bobby Fischer, in their prime, were stronger players than Carlsen.
There is no debate, however, about who is the strongest female chess player. It’s Judit Polgár, no contest. No other woman has come close to her accomplishments. She is retired now. However, in the early 2000s, she was among the strongest players in the world competing in the highest-level tournaments. She reached a peak rank of 8th best in the world.
Let me put in perspective for you the stratospheric level of chess Polgár and Carlsen play. I’m struggling to win games way down in the patzer territory of an 800 Elo rating. Judit Polgár and Magnus Carlsen have peak ratings of 2735 and 2882 respectively. Roughly speaking, a 100 point gap in Elo rating indicates the weaker player has a 36% chance of winning a game. 200 point gap = 24%, 400 point gap = 9%, 800 point gap = 1%, gap between Carlsen and me = I have no chance to win.
In the 2000s, Judit Polgár was competing against men in a game of intelligence. Defeating them. Dealing with their chauvinistic attitudes. One example:
At Linares 1994, Polgár lost a controversial game to the World Champion Garry Kasparov. The tournament marked the first time the 17-year-old Polgár was invited to compete with the world’s strongest players. After four games she had two points. During her game with Kasparov in the fifth round, Kasparov gradually outplayed her and had a clear advantage after 35 moves. On his 36th move, the World Champion reportedly changed his mind about the move of a knight, and moved the piece to a different square. According to chess rules, once a player has released a piece, the move must stand, so if Kasparov did remove his hand, he should have been required to play his original move. Polgár did not challenge Kasparov in the moment, because, she stated, “I was playing the World Champion and didn’t want to cause unpleasantness during my first invitation to such an important event. I was also afraid that if my complaint was overruled I would be penalized on the clock when we were in time pressure.” She did, however, look questioningly at the arbiter, Carlos Falcon, who witnessed the incident and took no action.
The incident was caught on tape by a crew from the Spanish television company PVS, and the videotape showed that Kasparov’s fingers had left the knight. Tournament director Carlos Falcon did not forfeit Kasparov when this evidence was made available to him. As U.S. chess journalist Shelby Lyman pointed out, in the majority of sports “instant replays” do not overrule a referee’s original decision and chess is no exception. At the time the video had not been publicly released, at the request of tournament sponsor Luis Rentero, but it is now available on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aw4g3iDrsNk. At one point Polgár reportedly confronted Kasparov in the hotel bar, asking him, “How could you do this to me?” Following this incident, Kasparov bluntly told an interviewer “… she just publicly said I was cheating. … I think a girl of her age should be taught some good manners before making such statements.”
Yeah, not cool. Now you understand my use of the word girl.
Just to be clear. The above incident involved a former World Champion, Garry Kasparov, not Magnus Carlsen. I’m relating it to illustrate the shit she’s had to deal with when men don’t want to face the fact she is capable of defeating them.
That’s the backstory. Now, what happened in Madrid last month?
Magnus is hanging out in a park near the Candidates tournament. He’s playing games against chess hustlers, local Spanish players, and chess fans who realized the World Champion was nearby and willing to give anyone a game. He’s cool like that. Who walks up to the table and asks Magnus for a game? You guessed it, Judit Polgár.
What will happen when the strongest-ever female chess player challenges the strongest-ever male chess player to a game of blitz chess? Each player has three minutes to make all their moves. How long will the girl last? Before you watch their game, consider the challenges Judit faced.
Judit is 46 years old.
Magnus is 31 years old.
At the uppermost levels, chess is a young person’s game.
Judit has been retired from competitive play for eight years.
Magnus is an active player.
Magnus is the highest rated player in the world.
Magnus is the current World Champion.
As recently as two years ago, Magnus had an unbeaten streak of 125 games at classical time control, over a period of two years and three months.
What will happen? See for yourself.
Booyah! She’s incredible. I like when Magnus realizes he’s in serious trouble, is determined to find a way to defend, and says to the onlookers, “No applause yet. I’m going to find it.” Or maybe he says, “I’m going to fight.” When he realizes it’s hopeless, he offers his hand in resignation to Judit.
Now you know something about Judit Polgár. Share it with others, because her story is inspiring. You can gain the listener’s attention by beginning with a quote from a Grandmaster, who recalled Judit Polgár beating him when he was an established player and she was just a child. Who is Judit Polgár? He described her as:
This cute little auburn-haired monster who crushed you.
I had my chess engine, MadChess (approximately 2700 Elo), and a world-class chess engine, Komodo Dragon (3450 Elo), analyze Judit Polgár and Magnus Carlsen’s blitz game.
About the Blogger : Erik Madsen
I work as a Software Architect at an insurance company. We're building a modern tech stack in the cloud using C#, Azure, ASP.NET Core, Angular, TypeScript, etc.
I've always been interested in chess (a game of complete information) and poker (a game of incomplete information). This is my attempt to write chess-playing software. I'll get to poker later.
You may be interested to explore my general programming blog, ErikTheCoder.